MIT104 Information Systems in Practice Report 3 Sample

MIT104 Information Systems in Practice Report 3

Assignment Task

Research Report -(2000 words)

Results- What you found- This is where you indicate what you found in your research. You give the results of your research, but do not interpret them.

Discussion- Relevance of your results, how it fits with other research in the area- This is where you discuss the relevance of your results and how your findings fit with other research in the area. It will relate back to your literature review and your introductory thesis statement.

Conclusion- Summary of results/findings- This is a summary of the most significant results/findings. You should not include any new material in this section. Sometimes you could indicate some areas where your research has limits or where further research would be useful.

Recommendations-What needs to be done as a result of your findings- This includes suggestions for what needs to be done as a result of your findings. Recommendations are usually listed in order of priority.
References-All references used in your report

Appendices- Any additional material which will add to your report- These should add extra information to the report. If you include appendices they must be referred to in the body of the report and must have a clear purpose for being included. Each appendix must be named and numbered.

Solution

1. Results

In this section, the empirical results of the research are presented with no interpretation. Business executives, IT managers, and AI experts were respondents for the data collection comprising in-depth interviews to reach, and the data were complemented with relevant case studies and thematic analysis of the responses obtained from interviews.

1.1 Interview Results

A total of 12 participants were interviewed across three separate parameters: business executives,  IT executives, and AI experts. These stakeholders described the realities that came with embracing AI in their organisations, as well as the challenges and opportunities that came from doing so. Their answers underscore the enabling side of AI, a factor of digital transformation, but also underline the disabling context, as established by regulatory dilemmas, such as ethics and technology.

Some of the interviewees noted that efficiency gains and cost-cutting were the principal drivers of change, with one executive adding, "We can reduce operational costs by 25% based on the AI-driven automation for MBA assignment expert processes and redeploy initiatives to innovation." The IT managers said AI predictive analytics had supported flexible and data-driven decision-making.

Those challenges were repeatedly raised across the interviews. Data privacy and regulatory compliance were nearly two key issues. "Integrating AI into legacy systems is technically quite challenging and raises serious data security and privacy compliance issues," an IT manager had described. Many responses highlighted the high financial costs involved, along with ensuring the ethical use of AI. An AI expert remarked, "AI has great potential to transform and create value, but the challenges it creates, like the ethical implications of biased algorithms and the lack of transparency in some decision-making processes, counter the benefits".

Table 1: Questionaries
(Sources: Self created)

Moreover, it was mentioned several times by participants that due to the rapid advancements of AI technologies, one must continue to learn and evolve with the tools. Recent academic studies (e.g., Olan et al., 2022; Tschang and Almirall, 2021) support that AI adoption is accelerating — but businesses are also dealing with major implementation challenges, as suggested by the responses. In addition, interviewees agree that organisations need to strike a balance between innovation and responsible use, with ethical frameworks and data privacy at the core of their priorities.

Indeed, the insights from the interviews present a dual narrative; in one respect, AI holds promise to transform operational processes and drive innovation, while on the other hand, practical concerns, particularly about privacy, integration, and cost, highlight the need for comprehensive frameworks and ongoing governance. It provided confirming evidence across stakeholders that the journey towards digital transformation underpinned by AI was both exciting and complex. Employees provide their own (mobile) devices for business purposes to reduce expenses through cut purchase and maintenance costs.

Roughly 74% of U.S. organizations are using or planning to use BYOD. Increasingly, stakeholders emphasized the importance of collaboration between regulatory bodies and industry players to reduce compliance requirements and promote innovation.

1.2 Case Studies

These case studies in the research suggest both successful AI application and the specific problems posed by digital transformation. One case study was on a multinational retail corporation implementing AI-based customer analytics. According to the report, personalized marketing has improved customer engagement by 30%, resulting in a healthy increase in sales conversion rates. This study also tells one of the complicated stories of bringing AI into legacy IT environments and the cost implications.

Another study focused on a financial organization that applied AI to improve fraud detection. The bank enjoyed a reasonable amount of efficiency improvement due to predictive algorithms, which reduced fraud cases by 20% during the first year of adoption. However, it also specifies that the bank is expected to spend rather a lot on data protection measures to meet the regulatory requirements and protect the very sensitive customers' data. The comparison between the two cases shows that AI adoption is very promising in delivering immediate benefits (cost reduction, higher efficiency of operations, and better decision-making), but very careful planning is needed to ensure that integration challenges are overcome and ethical, compliant use prevails.

These case studies bring out a call for an integrated approach in which technology goes hand in hand with sound risk management, the theme that has found resonance in the academic literature on AI in business.

1.3 Thematic Analysis

From the thematic analysis, the interview findings and case-study material were synthesized to show patterns with a general recurrence across the data. Four broad themes were developed: enhancement of efficiency, challenges of integration, ethical considerations, and regulatory compliance.

Enhanced Efficiency: Participants interviewed as well as case-study participants mentioned enhanced operational efficiency, cost reduction, and AI's ability to support decision-making. AI was said to enable business agility through real-time analytics and automation.

Integration Challenges: A steady theme was the challenge of integrating new AI technology into a legacy system. From a technical angle;. Defiance issues were there, and very high-cost implementation was an entrance through the maze that confirmed the notions and experiences of the present literature (Olan et al. 2022).

Ethics: nearly all the interviewees brought in the aspects of bias and ethics around automated decision-making and insisted on the need for transparent algorithms and some internal ethical oversight mechanism for using AI responsibly.

Regulatory compliance: one such major challenge mentioned was regulatory scrutiny, especially in those sectors handling sensitive and confidential data. The interviews and case studies revealed how rigorous demands for privacy and security made the process considerably long and costly.
Together, these themes present a consolidated message that although AI is sure to drive improved business operations, its successful deployment must also consider technical and ethical and regulatory issues. It further propounds an obvious need for a multi-pronged approach to exploit the benefits of AI while minimizing the risks.

2. Discussion

In this section, the results are interpreted through qualitative interviews, case studies, and thematic analysis about what is currently known in the literature, demonstrating their relationships to research questions and objectives. The empirical evidence indicates that AI adoption in business leads to operational efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced decision-making. When questioned about gains deriving from AI, business executives mentioned largely savings of operational costs and revenue opportunities. This is in line with Olan et al. (2022), as such a study found that AI-driven processes can streamline operations and efficiently redeploy resources. However, among IT managers and AI experts, the concerns they indicated as technical challenges on the way to AI adoption include legacy integration, data privacy, and the need for robust ethical oversight. This same finding resonates with Tschang and Almirall (2021), who illustrated that with implementation, AI can transform business practices, yet it remains possible because the technical and regulatory roadblocks are so significant.

It is becoming increasingly clear from further analysis that the integration barriers and ethical concerns found in the interviews are intersecting. For instance, outdated IT infrastructure makes AI solutions inefficient but still augments risks to data security. That statement was confirmed by one IT manager who spoke of data privacy issues within legacy systems. As recent literature suggests, modern IT architectures have made secure integration of new AI technologies more difficult (Rana et al., 2022), this point held. AI experts brought to bear ethical facets of AI if algorithmic biases would result in inequitable outcomes where unmanaged. Hence, this translates into the necessity for multi-disciplinary approaches, with technology solutions supported by ethical frameworks and regulatory compliance measures.

Some unexpected outcomes emerged to confirm the existing literature. Some interviewees were cautiously optimistic about AI in the future, citing possible new job creation through retraining and upskilling, even while fearing job losses. This notion runs counter to a more conventional viewpoint of AI as a job-killer and suggests that, if nurtured properly, AI could stimulate the economy and affect workforce transformation. This more nuanced view shows that even though AI has generally accepted technical benefits, the human element—workforce adaptation is still a key variable in successful digital transformation.

Study limitations include a relatively small number of participants in the sample and potential bias in self-reported data from interview participants. The few instances may not sufficiently capture the vast diversity of AI implementations across industries. In some cases, the qualitative angle of the results may have led to an overemphasis on subjective experiences rather than more quantifiable outcomes. These limitations are taken to suggest that future research may consider a larger sample size and a mixed-methods approach in testing the findings.

A summary of the findings is given in the table below, which integrates the interview questions with the respective responses and comparative literature:

Table 2: Interview questions with the corresponding responses and literature comparisons
(Source: Self created)

Bringing everything into line, the conversation also affirmed the strength of AI in its prospect to transform, but realize that its full benefits can only be secured if businesses successfully navigate the technical, ethical, and regulatory challenges. However, the greater importance of existing literature to the interview findings strengthens the validity of the research itself. More importantly, this robust optimism regarding workforce transformation inspires future research directions and strategic investment in human capital. In a nutshell, the study buttresses the argument for an appropriate mixed-discipline approach that is adopted in businesses for digital transformation in which AI is used.

3. Conclusion

The purpose of the study is to highlight the effect of AI adoption on digital transformation in operations improvement, cost-saving, and data-based decision-making. Interviews captured the common view of business executives, IT managers, and AI experts that AI greatly contributes to strategy: operational efficiency by improved predictive analytics. Yet, the findings also recorded debilitating obstacles to the application of AI, especially in integrating AI with legacy systems, issues around data privacy, and ethical challenges like algorithmic bias. Authors within more credible academic literature have also raised similar concerns recently (Olan et al.., 2022; Tschang and Almirall, 2021), stating that innovation itself is subjected to equally high demands of ethical scrutiny and compliance.

From the case studies, featuring tangible efficiency gains in return, investments must be made to upgrade infrastructure and implement strong data security protocols for AI to provide continuous benefit. The thematic analysis corroborated the view that a digital transformation journey is not a linear process necessitating a collaboration of disciplines. In short, while AI may be an important engine of business innovation, its implementation has to be led by technical, regulatory, and ethical considerations. This research emphasizes, therefore, the need for organizations to plan for such an equanimity between the stride of technological development and ethical accountability to reap the full rewards of AI transformation.

4. Recommendations

• Infrastructure Upgrade: Investment in the modernization of legacy systems will pave the way for easy integration with AI.

• Data Safeguarding: The use of stronger encryption, anonymization, and continuous monitoring systems will protect sensitive data.

• Stringent Ethical Oversight: Cross-disciplinary boards should meet regularly to ensure that AI algorithms are tested for discriminatory biases.

• Support Workforce Adjustments: Continuous training for employees will help in transitioning staff into an AI-infused environment.

• Support for Compliance: Make sure the procedures are current and in line with ongoing developments in data protection.

Reference

Aljohani, A. (2023). Predictive Analytics and Machine Learning for Real-Time Supply Chain Risk Mitigation and Agility. Sustainability, 15(20), 15088. mdpi. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015088

Birdzell, L. (2022, May 18). How to Decrease the Cost of AI | Krista. Krista AI. https://krista.ai/how-to-decrease-the-cost-of-ai/
George, T. (2023, January 14). Primary Research | Definition, Types, & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/primary-research/

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications for marketing: a literature-based Study. International Journal of Intelligent Networks, 3(3), 119–132. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.08.005

Hanna, M., Pantanowitz, L., Jackson, B., Palmer, O., Visweswaran, S., Pantanowitz, J., Deebajah, M., & Rashidi, H. (2024). Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning. Modern Pathology, 38(3), 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686

J.P. Morgan. (2023, November 20). AI Boosting Payments Efficiency & Cutting Fraud | J.P. Morgan. Www.jpmorgan.com. https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/payments/payments-optimization/ai-payments-efficiency-fraud-reduction

Stefanovskyi, O. (2024, January 3). From Data to Decisions: 10 Business Breakthroughs via Machine Learning. Intelliarts. https://intelliarts.com/blog/machine-learning-business-applications/

Zirar, A., Ali, S. I., & Islam, N. (2023). Worker and workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) coexistence: Emerging themes and research agenda. Technovation, 124(124), 102747. sciencedirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102747

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S. and Giri, R.A., 2021. Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), pp.25-36. https://oro.open.ac.uk/75449/1/Dawadi%2C%20Shreshta%20and%20Giri%202021.pdf

IDC (2024). IDC: Artificial Intelligence Will Contribute $19.9 Trillion to the Global Economy through 2030 and Drive 3.5% of Global GDP in 2030. [online] Available at: https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS52600524&utm.

Olan, F., Arakpogun, E.O., Suklan, J., Nakpodia, F., Damij, N. and Jayawickrama, U., 2022. Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 145, pp.605-615. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322002387

Oyekunle, D. and Boohene, D., 2024. Digital transformation potential: The role of artificial intelligence in business. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 9(3), p.1. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/9426469.pdf

Rajagopal, N.K., Qureshi, N.I., Durga, S., Ramirez Asis, E.H., Huerta Soto, R.M., Gupta, S.K. and Deepak, S., 2022. Future of Business Culture: An Artificial Intelligence‐Driven Digital Framework for Organization Decision‐Making Process. Complexity, 2022(1), p.7796507. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2022/7796507

Rane, N.L., Paramesha, M., Choudhary, S.P., and Rane, J., 2024. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for advanced business strategies: A review. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 2(3), pp.147-171. https://puiij.com/index.php/research/article/download/143/114