MG401 Leadership in Agribusiness Task 4 Report 1 Sample

MG401 Leadership in Agribusiness Task 4 Report 1

Word Limit: 500 words, plus references

Required

You are required to address the following tasks in your assignment:

• Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the readings on the topic

• Areas of agreement/ disagreement among authors

• Empirical evidence (if any)

• Personal reflection, which might include identification of learning(s), application in a professional or personal context (either actual or aspirational).

• Gaps in the literature that indicate future areas of research

Your report should be structured as follows:

• Title page

• Introduction

• Areas of agreement/ disagreement among authors

• Discussion on empirical evidence provided and gaps in the literature

• Reflection & Conclusion

• References

Solution

Introduction

Management in agribusiness therefore entails the directing and controls of agricultural business to the attainment of strategic objectives and effective handling of challenges in the sector. This is crucial in driving for MBA Assignment Expert the innovation process, guaranteeing sustainable improvement, and exploring the efficient use of resources. In this report, I will present the agreement and the disagreement of the authors, present any existing data, indicate any gaps in the literature, and consider the applications.

Areas of Agreement/Disagreement Among Authors

I also discovered that authors recognize the importance of flexibility and strategic orientation as the key factors to address industry issues in the field of agribusiness leadership. Importantly, they focus on the aspects of innovation and sustainability to get success (Decuypere & Schaufeli, 2020). However, there is a big controversy between what is regarded as conventional management and contemporary management. Some will opt for transformational leadership change approach while others opted for the transactional leadership change being propounded by high performance stability kind of change. There is also controversy in regard to the use of technology; while some consider it as a key to future development, others emphasize the need to preserve some roots in the form of traditional practices and principles in the automotive business.

Discussion on Empirical Evidence and Gaps in the Literature

I observed while conducting my literature review that several studies emphasize the significance of adaptive leadership within the context of agribusiness and increased organizational performance and resiliency. Research also found that executives who dedicate themselves to generating innovations concerning sustainability secure greater performance in agricultural enterprises, thus, confirming theoretical pointers regarding the significance of strategic vision and flexibility solutions (Durmus and Kirca, 2020). Nevertheless, some gaps were identified, specifically, the lack of understanding regarding the effects of leadership on distinct sub-sectors such as small-scale sectors and large-scale sectors. There is also a lack of extensive information concerning the outcomes of leadership practices in relation to sustainability and engagement. As highlighted in this paper, there is limited research done on different aspects of leadership in agriculture, and more longitudinal studies need to be undertaken to understand the impact of different leadership styles across different scenarios (Elmaghrabi, 2021). Through the integration of empirical data, it is possible to develop a better understanding of how leadership determines the effectiveness of the organizations in the field of agribusiness.

Reflection & Conclusion

Reading through the literature in leadership in the agribusiness, I gather that flexibility and creativity are a plus. One lesson leader probably learn is that it is important to embrace the new and innovative methods while at the same time adhering to the conventional methods that will guarantee success. This perspective highlights the need for organizations to promote the culture of sustainability and flexibility in organizations. Such knowledge can improve my professional practice and personal development when taking leadership positions. These gaps are as follows: The effects of leadership on the different forms of agriculture, the impact on sustainability, and the comparative effectiveness of the leadership styles in the various climates. Further research should be done on these areas to provide a better understanding of leadership for the future in agribusiness as well as its consequences.

References

Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 34(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219892197

Durmus, S. C., & Kirca, K. (2020). Leadership styles in nursing. In S. C. Durmus (Ed.), Nursing – New perspectives. Intechopen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89679

Elmaghrabi, M. E. (2021). CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), 892–919. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2020-0036